|

click
logo to see my record
privacy notice
I'm
PayPal Verified
TATER DOG
| |
As printed by computer geeks.com
CPU Socket Basics, Intel:
|
Although there are currently only
two main players in the CPU market, AMD and Intel, the number of choices
is still enough to make the typical consumer’s head spin. Each
manufacturer has a few different models to promote, and many of these
models can be
found in a few different form factors (namely, the “sockets” to
which they connect) that exclude interchangeability.
This two-part series of Tech Tips will look at a few details of each of
the currently-supported CPU (Central Processing Unit) sockets and how
they are all similar and different from one to another. First up, we
will take a look at the CPU sockets supporting modern Intel processors.
|
Socket 478
For
all of these form factors, the number following “socket” refers to
the number of CPU pins or connectors. Socket 478 is a format
specifically designed for Intel’s
Celeron, Pentium
4, and mobile
Celeron/Pentium processors.
This socket supports processors with frontside buses of 400 MHz (100
MHz x 4), 533 MHz (133 MHz x 4), and 800 MHz (200 MHz x 4), and
provides top speeds from below 1 GHz to higher than 3 GHz. The Intel
naming system used for the Pentium 4 processors in this class uses
letters to represent the frontside bus speeds present. An “A”
means 400 MHz, “B” means 533 MHz, and “C” means 800 MHz. So, a
Pentium 4 2.4C would offer greater performance than a 2.4B or a 2.4A,
despite them all having the same 2.4 GHz clock speed.
The Pentium class of processors, like many others from AMD and Intel,
also apply names to the “cores” present on the processor. The core
is the processing portion of the CPU, generally found at the center of
the silicon wafer. As the architecture within cores of the same type
of processor change, new names are given to signify the different
levels of performance that users may experience. The Northwood,
Gallatin, and Prescott cores can be found on Pentium 4 processors of
the same speed, and a main difference between the three is that the
first two are fabricated on a 0.13 micron (one one-millionth of a
meter) process and the Prescott is fabricated on a 0.09 micron
process. A lower number implies a more tightly-packed core that
generally requires less power to perform the same operations.
Later
generation Socket 478 Pentium 4 processors were the first to implement
Intel’s Hyper-Threading
Technology, which allowed for applications to be run in parallel,
thus improving the performance of the system. Although not nearly as
strong, the concept is similar to having a dual processor system or
dual-core processor, as systems with Hyper-Threading enabled
processors can handle intensive applications much easier than the same
system without Hyper-Threading.
Socket 478 was Intel’s flagship format for several years, and
continues to be a popular choice among Pentium 4 motherboards. Socket
478 motherboards were first compatible with SDRAM
memory, then RAMBUS
memory, and as it became more popular DDR
memory became the format of choice. But, Intel’s decision to
embrace DDR2 (among other developments) has resulted in a totally new
CPU socket for Pentium 4 processors… Socket T.
|
Socket T (LGA 775)
Socket
T actually doesn’t mount to a socket like the rest of processors on
this list, as the pins usually found on the processor have been moved
to the motherboard, and the processor now receives the 755 pins on its
underside. Socket
T processors are basically the next generation of Celerons and
Pentium 4s found on the Socket 478 format, continuing many of the same
attributes, such as Hyper-Threading, on the Pentium 4 series.
The Celerons in Socket T only support a 533 MHz frontside bus (Celeron
D), and the Pentium 4s support both an 800 MHz frontside bus and a new
1066 MHz (266 MHz x 4) frontside bus. Speeds of the processors can
range from under 3 GHz while the high end of the speed scale has not
yet been reached. Processors approaching 4 GHz are becoming available,
and it will be interesting to see how fast this format will be able to
climb.
The architecture changes allow for greater efficiency, and this
format of CPUs is the first to take advantage of the new DDR2
memory format. Although DDR2 has been slow to catch on, as
manufacturers refine its performance the benefits should make its use
quite appealing.
As Intel transitioned to the LGA (Land Grid Array) 775 format, they
also transitioned to a three digit naming convention, similar to the
PR (Performance Rating) grades that AMD had used for years. Instead of
simply marketing a 3.0 GHz Pentium 4 Prescott core as such, they now
refer to it as the Pentium 4 530. A 2.8 GHz Prescott is now called a
520, and a 3.8 GHz Prescott is called a 570.
|
Socket 603/604
These
CPUs may not be as common as the others, but are worthy of inclusion
on this list anyway. Socket 603 and Socket 604 are the home to
Intel’s modern Xeon processors, which are more likely to be found in
a high-end server than in a desktop computer.
The Xeon can come with frontside buses ranging from 400 MHz (100 MHz x
4) to 800 MHz (200 MHz x 4), and provide top speeds that now reach 3.6
GHz. Socket 603 is for older, slower Xeons capable of a 400 MHz
frontside bus, and Socket 604 adds the one pin simply to identify the
faster bus speeds. Socket 603 processors will fit and function in a
Socket 604 motherboard, but the opposite will not work.
Xeons are powerful processors all on their own, but the architecture
of the CPU and supporting motherboards allows for serious systems to
be configured with
dual processors, or perhaps even
four processors, to really make light work of even the most
intensive application.
|
A M D
Sockets
Socket A
Socket A was the staple format in
AMD’s line-up for years, carrying the brand through the
Athlon, Thunderbird, Duron, Athlon XP, Athlon MP, and
Sempron classes of processors. The number of pins found on
the bottom of a Socket A CPU totals 462, and this is one of
the few formats that is not named for the number of pins
found on the processor.
|
|
|
Socket A processors came with
frontside bus speeds from 200 MHz (100 MHz x 2) up to 400 MHz
(200 MHz x 2). Socket A processors ranged in top speeds from
under 1 GHz to just over 2 GHz, but the identification of a
Socket A processor’s true speed is difficult due to AMD’s
use of PR (Performance Rating) grades instead of true
processor speed as a sales tool.
For example, an AMD
Athlon XP 3000+ doesn’t have a speed of 3.0 GHz, but
rather 2.167 GHz. AMD contends that their architecture
provides performance equivalent to the PR grade, despite the
actual speed being much lower.
Early Socket A systems supported SDRAM
memory, but as the technology advanced and DDR
memory became available, these processors took advantage
of the increased performance. DDR memory offered greater
overall performance at the same clock speeds as SDRAM, as well
as the potential for much higher clock speeds, so it was only
a matter of time before it became the standard memory for use
with these processors.
Just like Intel, AMD cores in this series also have names to
distinguish different levels of performance within the same
class of processor. For example, Duron cores carry names such
as Morgan and Applebred, while Athlon XP processor cores have
names such as Palomino, Thoroughbred, and Barton (listed in
order from weakest to strongest).
The long-lived success of Socket A is winding down, as the
last date for orders to be placed for production
has just passed. As we say goodbye to Socket A, AMD
intends to focus more attention on similar processors for
Socket 754, as well as the higher-end Socket 939/940 formats. |
Socket 754
Socket
754 picks up where Socket A left off, offering support for
CPUs including the Sempron and Athlon 64. As the name
implies, the processor features 754 tiny pins that interface
with the socket on the motherboard. As processors develop,
the number of pins manufacturers can fit on the back becomes
more and more amazing.
The Sempron class of processor is more of a
budget-conscious offering, with current PR grades available
from 2600+ to 3300+, while the Athlon 64 is the more
powerful 64-bit offering with PR grades from 2800+ and climbing
past 3700+. All Socket 754 processors support a
frontside bus of 400 MHz (200 MHz x 2), and presently all
systems utilize DDR memory.
|
Socket 939/940
Socket
939 and 940 support the current top-of-the-line offerings
from AMD and, as the names imply, they are separated by one
pin. Like their Socket 754 cousins, this format of AMD
processors utilizes DDR memory and provides a frontside bus
of 400 MHz (200 MHz x 2).
Socket 939 supports Athlon 64 processors with PR grades
currently up to 4000+, as well as the Athlon 64 FX series
which takes the performance to new levels for game play and
other intensive applications. Socket 940 is more the
business side of this pair of sockets, offering support for
both Athlon 64 FX series CPUs and the AMD Opteron class of
server processors. The Opteron series of processors include
a feature called “dual-core,” where one processor is
effectively seen as two, and given the possibilities of
multi-processor motherboards, the computing power can be
incredible. A recent release from AMD is the Athlon 64 X2,
which brings high-performance dual-core technology to a
Socket 939 desktop environment, but has yet to become
available to the public for purchase.
Where many AMD processors used a 4 digit PR grade for
marketing, the FX series of Athlon 64 processors uses a two
digit code (i.e., FX-51, FX-55) and the Opteron uses a three
digit code (i.e., Opteron 244, Opteron 252). All of these
designations can sure make things confusing, and given the
varied nomenclature that AMD alone currently uses, it can be
tricky figuring out how fast a CPU really is.
|
Final Words
As CPU technology advances, the sockets
that correspond to them are forced to change as well. The
new physical sizes, internal architecture, and thermal
properties require that the ‘packaging’ evolve. A
negative side effect of this development is that
motherboards wind up with limited “upgrade paths” when
it comes to adding a faster processor. Although this can
occasionally be remedied with socket
adaptors, as AMD and Intel continue down their parallel
paths of development, this situation can be expected to
continue. With that said, it looks like AMD’s
next CPU socket isn’t that far off.
|
|
|